The F Clause of Divorce: Irretrievable
breakdown of Marriage
The women
wife empowerment movement has lost its direction and spirits in india, the
parasitic approach towards husband has now become an integral ingredient in their
DNA and another Frankenstein is in making.
After DV Act in 2005 and more so
since 2010 the sanity of the entire clan supporting women empowerment is in
question by neutrals too, as general public has felt the word overboard an ‘understatement’
when it comes to supporting women. The speculations are 13F clause of the divorce if passed, would entitle the wife
to file for an unchallenged divorce under Irretrievable break down of marriage
and get entitled for 50% of husband’s inherited property too apart from other
incentives. Women already had 498a and 125 and DV act.
One section wants to empower
women, where women = only wife; as per their logic they have to become wives to
get their ‘destined share of property’, and they continue to deprive them from
their right in parental property which if implemented is actually a better
solution.
Any intellect would agree that women
should not be made to wait till they become wives to get their right in
property of any kind. Just like a male child, they should be given equal share
in their inheritance from her parents, this would solve all problems and burden
of litigations on courts. She should be empowered when born irrespective of
gender. This will make her empowered and independent from staying in an abusive
relationship and also free her from remaining dependent on a relationship for
survival.
Otherwise we are accepting the
gender bias legally. The bill if passed as per the wishes of the myopic,
prejudiced and insensitive feminists it would disturb the peaceful social
pattern at large as the repercussions would be far more greater than the
solution.
CAUTION: Now with desperate amendments
like discretion left to Judge, the scenario is going to be worst. How can one
ensure that the judge (after all a human) is not biased or influenced against
the husband? A male judge may have sympathies or soft corner for wife and a
lady judge will have prejudices against the male (as per the general misandrist
trend).
Who will question ‘the
Judge’ in absence of machinery like LOKPAL? With such incomplete apparatuses
are we getting ready for another disastrous Indian law against the family of
husband? We will create GODs of EVIL like Hiranyakashyapu and Asuras who
manipulated and took over the control over GOD by misusing the power GIFTED to
him with good intentions. Here by giving power to the Judge who will have the control of manipulation.
|
MEN MUST NOT IGNORE ANTI MEN LAWS |
Traditional Arguments
like “all laws are misused and hence we cannot stop making laws” won’t be
impressive and would be highly shameful and irresponsible statements by
stalwarts. Rather have review clause in every law and study the misuse and
loopholes with a fix date to ensure proper implementation. Even men who are ignoring their rights and or
are supporting adverse laws without homework will face the music one day or the
other in near future.
A root cause analysis would help
us know that a girl child has to be empowered like a male child, right from her
birth and not wait for her empowerment till she gets married. Otherwise we are
just creating a record on paper and GOD OF THE EVIL in reality.
The F Clause seems to be blindly favoring
FEMALES and Finishing Males.
10 Comments:
Jinesh Jee,
Your illustrative expression/s and analysis is deep rooted with nothing but truth in it. Hope Indian women folk get empowered in the Truest sense and start contributing in letting Men to breathe too.
Yes,one gets what one gives and me pray for those officials to realize the same before it gets just too late.
Wishing for 'Sound' Indian Families soon.
Regards.
JaiSatChitAnand
Thank You for your views.
and after all this, at the end of the day, they say, India is a democracy. Equal rights for all.
.
.
Total B.S.
And then after all this B.S., at the end of the day they say "India is a democratic nation and provides equal rights to everyone"
PS: please remove this word verification, dunno y, but urs is the only blog where i rarely get it right anytime. thats y u never see my comment.
The f clause of divorce is totally blind biased and against the principle of equality. It is the brain child of our illiterate, illogical and ill minded political leaders for their vote bank politics. We as men rights activists condemn and oppose this law. women empowerment means wife empowerment in this country as you have rightly pointed out.
Dear Cynosure,
My apologies for trouble caused and Gratitude for your time.
You got it right this time and ur comment is here.
The comments are on moderation to avoid all unwanted stuff plus the word verification is for spam to avoid programmed messages.
Keep Visiting. Cheers.
Thank You Chetan for your time and views.
In 2012 in India 43.6% crime against woman are reported as 498A not rape. Rape is only 10.2% ( source http://ncrb.nic.in/CD-CII2012/cii-2012/Chapter%205.pdf).
I wonder why nobody talks about 498A. According to this statistics every newspaper should print 4x more stories about 498A cases than rape.
It seems 498A is lucrative to only corrupt police officer who use it to take bribe. This also increase the workload of judicial system. (the acquittal rate in > 95%). This 498A is the real reason our judicial system is slow. And this is used a tool by corrupt police to take bribe.
Please do something.
Dear Atul,
Good point.
Its the attitude that matters
it is the guy next door is bad syndrome that is making it happen. making the whole data asymmetrical.
like telling men are adulterous would be one side of the symmetry but with whom no one talks which is the other side of the symmetry. anyway this is a separate and long debate.
thank you for your feedback, keep coming.
I read many arguments for and against 498a and not sure which really in reality hold true. anyone help?
Post a Comment
<< Home