False 498a and Domestic Violence Police Complaint

The Officially Unknown Truth behind a Wife's False Complaint against Husband, his Siblings and Parents.

I would like to thank the team behind this episode for informing people about the other side of the Torture. Below are the clips from a gujarati Serial "Chhutta Chhedda" meaning Divorce. This episode shows how the husband's family including his mother and sister are harassed by wife under the wife centric laws which are anti women, anti male, anti senior citizen,  over all family breaker and Anti Social.

This is a very well covered story in a short time. Well enacted and well directed. 

This episode shows how petty fights are picked up and the same is used as a reason to quote as Torture on wife.

This clip below shows How a false police complain is done and how helpless the police are. Many families are harassed by the wife by threatening of police in petty matters. There are also good number of cases where a false complaint is actually filed.

This clip below shows how a dominating wife demands a house in her deal for divorce and how settlements are done. And what circumstances leads a simple guy to get in to drinking habit. And people finally would blame him and show sympathy to the real perpetrator that is his 498a-DV type wife.

This Post is only to promote the awareness among people who support a wife on her face value and Berate the Husband by the very virtue. The people are unaware of the truth and this is an attempt to explain the other side of the story.

Jinesh Zaveri.

Poison Pill at Jhalianwalah baug: DV Act & 50% Asset Bill for Wife

Q: If you were stuck at Jhalianwalah baug with your family where there is a blind shoot out. What would be your 1^st reaction after safe guarding your family?

Well I would try and protect myself as well, but with no option left I would end my life gracefully rather than the disgraceful bullet.  


Cases like 498a, 406 on whole family, 125 etc, DV Act & 50% asset share bill are like Hostile Bullets of General Dyer. 

In other words its a Hostile Takeover by the unscrupulous wife; where as getting Disowned would be The Graceful Poison Pill.

Takeover by a Traditional Bahu (not the kaykay’s): Traditionally speaking, when a newly wed bahu used to come to her matrimonial home she used to be on a performance spree and had a learning curve (closing the cultural gap between the 2 families) and act as a force of balance between the two. It used to be a job of a matured lady. This virtue of hers often made her to earn the ownership of the house. This ownership (like company shares with dividend) was measured from the growing number of keys hanging on her waist. A Casual, friendly, just and responsible takeover. With a rightful appending of name as Mrs.so-an-so, that is to say owner of that house.  The bride over the years earned the house control and that used to be effective takeover, merger and acquisition.

Unearned Hostile Takeover by DV Act / Proposed 50% asset share bill (the likes of Kaykay): But somewhere during the time span, this process got lost and only the result was kept in mind. Now a days what women want is the control of the house minus the process of earning, new proposed 50% share in hubby's asset laws are suggesting that they want the share but not the accountability, calling responsibility / duty as the atrocities that they faced since generations, being held accountable would be a contempt of a loosly drafted law. Thus causing problems and this takeover in economic term becomes a Hostile Takeover. Further reports are pouring in of the natives of the home being thrown out or forced to vacate by clever methods by the pro(women) wife lobby.

Feminist have got so carried away that they are now accusing the grooms of being smart, they get disowned…., but what are they trying to hide? (strictly from dowryless marriage point of view), the girl too gets conveniently disowned when bidaai takes place. And I am not justifying the wrongful torture on brides as we are discussing willful dowryless marriage and  I am countering the argument which I once heard by the feminist on the television that if the mother in law never worked how come she has the house in her name? The answer is, she did a friendly takeover by becoming the operations manager of the house. And one cannot argue that one won’t work for the family (indoors and/or outdoors) and also would not contribute to the expenses but will want to have stake in all.

The bride is actually executing a Hostile Takeover of a stake in the Guy’s assets right from the parental property to the Now newly illdefined matrimonial home till the interim alimony to the final settlement in with trump cards like kids, possession of stridhan, 498a threat, DV threat or execution, but thank god some judges are sensible enough not to get carried away.  But again 50% asset bill in Maharashtra is feared to have “consumption” of wife in hubby’s assets what so ever earned or inherited. But her earnings may be protected.

Poison Pill at Jhalianwalah Baug: I stumbled upon this concept when I was surfing for Takeover of companies, for my last employer. HOSTILE TAKEOVER is a bad practice and economics has combating tactics called the poison pill which is rightfully fair. Every dote has and antidote similarly every blackmail has a whitemail and in economics every hostile takeover has methods to counter it and its all legal. To which feminist cannot complain. What the hell has the cunning bride done to stake claim? Just rights and no duties? And we would be losers in any case, so it better to channlise the demise of ownership. As we are left with only a poison pill? Yes its better to lose to Apne than to Paraye due to unfair laws. To save Indian family from being victimized these rational steps have to be taken. Now they ask what is a family without a wife? But then what is an Indian family without parents and siblings (mother, sister).

Further everytime feminists complain that boys get disowned from the family, they sound like the viruses of the Cancer, complaining “that how dare they amputate our territory of existence in their body to SAVE THEIR BODY. Now that we are empowered we do not want them to use medicines, since there has been a history, of Science winning but we are empowered Cancer Viruses and we can’t lose……” Well let’s face it, disowning is not a pleasant process neither is amputating. But it is the obvious solution to stop the vested interest empowerment bug from spreading it like cancer in the family that is progress friendly. (how wrong is the term empowerment, instead it should be equality)

Protecting one self from a virus that is deadly for the body is not a crime. Similarly a family that disowns the abla affected and wedded son, is doing a sensible thing. As they are right in justifying by asking a simple question that “it took us 4 decades to build a home and how come the same goes post 7 drills of saptapadi overnight? With no responsibility, she is welcome to own the responsibility and earn the dhan and not loot it overnight.” And that too after rightfully empowering the daughter for inheritance, who is a human too and not a dump material.

They say that flat belongs to the mother because of tax reasons and failsafe business reasons of the father of the groom. But well the mother had to earn the flat by taking over certain responsibilities of the house and had absolutely no hostility what so ever in that and it was till date safe for the male to gift the flat in her name unlike today where adultery by women is contested to be a civil offense. And live ins are any day beneficial for the women.

And the bottomline is, those martyrs (shaheed’s) at Jhalianwalah Baug who decided to jump in the well (poison pill) and die rather than die to the hands of General Dyer’s Gunmen are still in the minds of those victim husbands who decided to disown assets (life) rather than giving it to the oppressor armed with misused law practice. Hence there would be more husbands who would prefer to be disowned and rightfully lose their rights and assets to their family rather than to a oppressor who is a gold digger.

Mumtaz earned the taj in her name like a white knight and did not pass a court order then. A Rickshawallah told me that “The Thakurs earned the land in Kandivali after all the selfless service for lifetime to a generation of a Childless Marwari Business Family now known as Thakur Complex and the Famous Will of Priyamvada Birla that went to her Chartered accountant R S Lodha. These are earned wills by virtue of service and not terror.

The amputation or poison pill stands justified here as well as there has to be a logic in staking claim. With growing cases of Domestic Violence Act misuse that allow access to the wife in matrimonial and new proposed bill of 50% ownership in husbands assets as feared would be a Hostile takeover (Kabza) by wife, then definitely Poison pill is the only solution for husband rather than succumbing to logicless bullying. And hence even the Apostles of the August bodies have mentioned such laws and clauses as one of the examples of a loosely drafted laws. One such bill is feared to land in Maharashtra with wife's asset as stridhan with no share for hubby, but hubby's total asset would entitle 50% share for wife to begin with.

Analyse this.

Jinesh. 

Nazar Lagi Raja Tore Bangle Parr - Wife's Equal Share in Hubby's Assets.

Maharashtra, Arguably the Feminist Capital of the country in Implementing Laws, soon may be Bombarded with one extremely biased anti-husband Law. An overboard Feminist View is about to set in. Once Again talks of Wife's Rights, NOT Responsibilities. Apparently looks legally Dictatorial and would leave Wife fully Empowered like the British and leaving the Indian Husband "Helpless" like a wounded Kashmiri Pundit Out of his own land or more like a P O K - Patni Occupied Kholi. 

There are so many loop holes in this Idea of Empowering Wife.

First there is no clarity of period of marriage. 

- Can a wife claim property the next day of marriage? 

- Can a wife of one year while divorcing, with no kids and limited joint stay claim half of assets of husband?

- What about a Daughter who has been dumped by her brothers and father, will she have to get married, dupe a man and only then she would get property or will she be able to claim her fathers property equally strongly?

- What about a lady who will marry 2-3 times not find things compatible and every time divorce her hubby with 50% of her assets? (there are cases of short lived multiple marriages of women)

- There are marriage where union of husband and wife has been as short as 1 year and few months and separation of 5-6 years and more. In such cases how can one claim that marriage has been long and wife should get her due share. 

Its all so bizzare as of now. Only one thing is clear, the father can "dump the daughter" by getting her married, by lying to the groom. And later if the girl has to get divorced, the father is not Concerned. But husband has to bear the brutal consequences in form of a Lagaan. That is share in his property and assets "one way". Like telling Nazar Laagi Raja Tore Bangale Par.

I will wait till I get the Humiliating Draft of the bill but 2 headlines in TOI has spolied my Diwali once again like every year. One headline bombed on Tuesday and the other on Thursday. Here are the news details. They discreetly introduce such bills or call for meeting to discuss on strategic days so that most men are busy elsewhere. (This meeting is on 25th Nov, Tuesday on Dhanteras.)

The Link for the TOI news Item. (details pasted below)

MUMBAI: Women, who often find themselves on shaky ground as they have no property in their name even after decades of marriage, may have a reason to smile. Prominent women activists, including advocate Flavia Agnes, are all praise for the State Commission for Women's initiative in proposing a bill to make a woman a co-owner in the property of her husband.

Activists from women's organizations like Majlis said the fact that the commission came out with a concept note and called for a collaborative meeting with voluntary organisations and advocates on October 25 to discuss and fine-tune the proposed bill, gives hope to millions of hapless women who are left at the husband's mercy, activists say. "Majlis welcomes the move of the Maharashtra state to bring in a legislation permitting a share to women in the property of the husband," Agnes said, adding, "This is a timely and welcome move.

Majlis had been campaigning for this issue since 1995 and had even helped the Maharashtra State Women's Commission draft a bill on a wife's property rights around 10 years ago. But nothing much moved further, said Agnes. "At that time, it was envisaged that the Domestic Violence Bill would address the problem of women's matrimonial residence," she said.

Agnes and other lawyers focusing on women's legal issues said that the Domestic Violence Act did not solve all the issues for women. The problem again surfaced when the government was proposing introduction of a bill on irretrievable breakdown of marriage, said Agnes, pointing out the need for a comprehensive law on women's right over matrimonial property.

Veena Gowda, women's rights advocate said, "It is high time that there is a discussion on the property rights of a woman within a marriage. The problem really occurs when a long marriage fails and the woman finds herself vulnerable as she is left with no ownership rights over the matrimonial property." Activists say if the purpose is to save a marriage then at its inception itself, wives' security must be addressed. "Property rights must be brought in on grounds of equity and not merely on equality, as the idea is to secure a woman's rights and sense of belonging to the new family that she is starting," added Gowda.

Former State Women's Commission chairperson Nirmala Sawant-Prabhawalkar favoured the move, especially to ensure that women feel financially independent. "It is a progressive step, one that must be followed up as it would bring relief to millions of women."

The commission's concept note wants a woman's name to be included in her husband's inherited property too but at the same time offers independence to the husband to retain what he gets as gifts. It also proposes that a husband should be able to approach court for orders if the wife, whose consent will be required for sale or transfer of property, fails to give any bona fide reason for her refusal.

The key question expected to be discussed at the meet, is what happens when there is a divorce. Often women lack any right to shelter when they need it the most, said Prabhawalkar. Some of these issues need to be worked on, said a member of the women's commission.

Agnes said the state's move is important for another reason too. She said activists had submitted before the Joint Select Committee of Parliament that without a legislation on the division of matrimonial property, the bill on irretrievable breakdown of marriage would cause serious harm to women as men would be able to obtain a divorce and deprive women of their right to shelter and security which marriage provides.

Agreeing that difficult yet crucial issues will be raised, women rights activists are happy that "at least the debate has started".

BOX:

Issues

Will only the husband's property be divided or will the wife's property be divided too?

Will the dowry that a woman brings into the marriage be deemed to be her separate property or joint property of the spouses? Experts said it may be necessary to separate the property which a woman brings into the marriage

The issue of working women will need to be discussed too, added advocate Rina Pujara

Quote

"In the Indian setting we have to deal with two main issues. In most cases, the matrimonial house is owned by the father-in-law or brother-in-law, or the business is jointly owned by elder members of the husband's family and his own share in it is negligible. In that case what will be the woman's share?"

Flavia Agnes | advocate

Domestic Violence on MEN

Domestic Violence.

Few days back an eye opening call from Mr Neeraj Gupta of Delhi inspired me to write this. He was quite concerned for the violence in TATA Ad. I watched the Ad and later saw series of other ads. I discovered actually punching bag is a MALE. The stats of male as perpetrator are all superficial, thanks to RTI.

It can be concluded well that world Survives by Torturing MEN even outside the courts. Even Corporate world, sell their Products by Showing Violence on MEN by WOMEN. When a man hits a woman it breeds sympathy for her. When a women hits a man, she breeds mockery and hatred for him, no matter what- no justifications are required for her to hit him. She is just supported.

The promos of "Mere Brother Ki Dulhan" are revolving around Katrina hitting Imran as the USP and Entertaining by public. Oh gosh!!! What a mentality!!!! 

October is known for launch of  Domestic Violence Act in 2005 to protect women. Since then the corporates and media has been soft on women and step motherly on man. They are pretending sleep over "torture on MEN" and rather adding entertainment angle to promote their product and belief that Men could be HIT like a commodity. Its all a mockery of men. 

Here’s a look on Domestic Violence on MEN as USP (Unique Selling Proposition for Dumb Creative Heads) Is Entertainment all about SLAP SLAP SLAPPING Male everytime?

A few Illustrations...

TATA’s 25 Kmpl. ad uses the prop of a woman hitting a Man 25 times to explain 25 kms. per litre mileage of their new model. How cheap! Not just the car, but the Promotional Idea too.

Shame on Your Creative team, TATA's.

Kurkure OMG

This one is just too much!!!! Juhi Chawla, the miss India contestant who must have said that she would work for WORLD PEACE in her Q n A session is hitting a man umpteen times in this ad to sell a feature of HOT SPICY NAMKEEN. Very ignominious and pathetic sense of imagination.

GO IBIBO

Ya they can claim “No Male was tortured in this Ad as we have used Cartoons” but they promoted the idea of Domestic Violence on MEN by Women beyond dispute. Pathetic.

Is creativity all about Hitting Men, presenting it in a funny way and Making Money from this Violent Idea? Sad! 

Here is the worst of all. 

BINDASS TV: WORST...

Not all MEN have read Bible, Not all men are Mahatma Gandhies. A man retaliating to an unexpected tight slap, is mercilessly bashed up by blind P***y worshipers. As if the victim male was expected to receive the slap and do nothing. Nothing is being done about it. Such channels, Programs and Anchors should be given mental rehabilitation and community lessons as punishment. 

Note: The Above Video apart from being very disturbing, also has extremely embarrassing and filthy language, where the male victim's Mothers and Sisters are cursed.

I, a citizen of India, human first; then a gender, protest this kind of outlook towards men. I want ministry for Men in INDIA soon. 

It is such a SHAME. Can't take this lying quietly. 

I am a Man! Hey! So what! Don't Slap me.........

Hey Guys, be A MAN and PROTEST the Wrong Doings. Be Proud being a MAN.

Sexual Harassment of Indian Male

 

Well this is India. Totally different from what we see in Stats that show harassment on women by men. But with no provision of machinery for Males to record complain we would never get the correct picture. 

Imagine the same content above (with gender roles reversed), if it was written by a lady to one of the popular columnists, the Advise would have been to file either a 498a or DV (in case of Husband/Wife), DV in case of a Live in Couple and in case of office, would have heralded the requirement for a Sexual Harassment Bill at Work Place. But this guy cannot be advised anything more other than quitting his job as there are no Laws to protect him.

Imagine after the act (or during the act if caught) the lady cries foul and gets her medical tests done, it will go against the male due to the semen samples. Where as it cannot prove who forced whom. He would be another so called Rapist who would be charged with relevant laws (either of work place or general).

As a Matter of Fact in weekly meetings we get cases like above where the husbands are victims to the wife's  forced impractical sexual desires. And the above case proves that even Males of any age group can be sexually Harassed at workplace too apart from his female counterpart in marriage or in a relationship. Indian law and mentality skips the very fact that women too can indulge, and men could be on the receiving end.

Last sunday Shiney Ahuja was acquitted by the same Media who convicted him and there is nowhere that Shiney could go or neither can he resort to any protection by law he has got his share of suffering before the trial, he is yet to be proven guilty but is not tagged innocent. There are many cases where innocent males are jailed under trial because of Rape charges but with no sufficient proof.

In short, National Commission for Men, Ministry for Men, 498B, Gender Neutral DV act and Gender Neutral laws are the only solution to stop this chaos in the society.We want Gender Neutral and Fool Proof Laws (misuse proof machinery or machinery to deter misuse)

Point to be Noted, Milord.

Jinesh Zaveri.

Shoot the Lawyer Twice.

Never outsource your case.

“You're trapped in a room with a tiger, a rattlesnake and a lawyer. You have a gun with two bullets. What should you do?

the answer is Shoot the lawyer. Twice.

This is what majority of the people will tell you who have hired a lawyer thinking this is another superman/woman clad in a black suit and will rescue me from the clutches of my problems. People with no interest in what the case is all about, generally males who look for a “quick fix” to their problems with a runaway attitude suffer at the hands of wife, system, as well as lawyer. As a marketing guy I was always taught to sell maximum, similarly, I understand that a lawyer too will sell a long lasting case to you.

Wives do have enough godfathers in terms of facilities by the state or in person that enables them to blindly outsource her case. But males are always at receiving end, they often get tempted to copy paste what their wives do in hiring a lawyer, without knowing that it’s an imbalanced war on the chessboard. Your complaint with respect to matrimonial dispute cannot be more than a NC with police, while hers similar complaint against you can be a cognizable offence, thus bringing you to a negotiation table out of fear for further blind legal carnage. In such cases lawyers too are out of scope of any help.

“Where can I get a good lawyer?”

This is one of the most frequently asked questions to me on the helpline. And my answer is “if you do not have the grip on your case then no lawyer is a good lawyer.” Your thorough home work is a must else you will fall in to this trap of outsourcing your case.

Lawyers are mere representatives.

We often confuse lawyers with courts and subconsciously think that they represent courts. Lawyers notice  is mere tactics of scaring, is often confused as courts' notice. Opposition Lawyer's call is attended with a lot of restraint and stress (well I am not telling to provoke the lawyer but one must know that the lawyer is no authority on your case or life). Never resign your confidence in front of the opposition lawyer or your lawyer as you know that they work for money and are mere service providers. But again do not outsource your core decisions to them. They have no authority to certify your divorce or marriage.

Lawyers in pre 498a.

Pre 498a: A HUGE chunk believes that if you file for a divorce case against your troubling spouse or give a lawyers notice then you are in the riding seat and will weaken her future cases against you. Well NO! the system has a perfect designed loophole that will allow your wife to make your life an Official MESS. (initially she was alone in harassing you, now she will have the system for making an early damage.Who cares about the case or conviction, the arrests are enough). It goes like this

1. You file a case or serve a lawyers notice

2. She suffers from a huge rejection feeling

3. She is unable to differentiate that your notice/case is civil NOT criminal

4. She now wants to teach you a lesson

5. She approaches the sleeping tiger (the system) and the executor is the lawyer.

6. She is advised to file for...

a. False 498a – Dowry (this will initiate the arrest of accused for investigation by police)

b. couple with false 406 – streedhan (the non bailable factor becomes stronger)

c. crpc 125 – monthly maintenance (so what if she is working, April fool hai na)

d. Domestic Violence Act (even duckworth lewis would not understand this hirnayakashaypu’s boon to surpanakha)

e. rest add ons may vary from case to case.

Moral : Husband cannot file for a divorce case that will give him divorce.

Who knows the law better? you or me?

Appointing a lawyer is a lot like choosing a partner. Its like if you have married in haste then you may have to repent at leisure. If your suggestion /discussions are blindly turned down by the lawyer, who like an abusive wife tells you his/her qualification on your queries, you are in for more trouble and hence don’t wait for tomorrow, rather change this lawyer as soon as yesterday.

I paid the lawyer advance money so now I will win the case as he/she will fight for me.

Interestingly in one of the SIF meetings I was handling this question and another fellow SIF Commando Amol Khar noticed and pitched in by saying “when we are employed in jobs we are first made to work for 30 days every month only then we are paid money, if we were paid advance we would not have been motivated to work for the rest of the month”. Similarly know what your lawyers had done and is going to do before you blindly pay. The rates beyond a point are proportional to your fear and ignorance. Keep a check on your case. Your clarity, involvement and monitoring will motivate him/her to perform.

Are you aware what rights you have in the system? What options you have in the system? How motivated are you to know your case? Unless you are not in control how will you know where your lawyer is taking you?

Hence appoint your lawyer who will be your team member and not a greedy guide who would take you for a ride in an unknown place and slap a fat bill.  For this thing to happen you too should be in total control of your case. You should know your case thoroughly with what charges are filed against you etc. All papers of complaints and relevant documents should be crystal clear. Surf the net and websites of Mens Movement in India with law implications so that you know what you can anticipate and what options you have.

And if you feel the heat and realize that there is no “fool proof facility for male to get rid of an abusive partner” then yes you too should join the movement of voluntarily helping others who are as dumb today as you were, before someone enlightened you for FREE, and work for changing the system.

To wind up there is another saying for lawyers which is "What do dinosaurs and decent lawyers have in common? They're both extinct." Well I would say you can appoint a Human who knows Law and for that you should be in control of your case and the relevant info so the lawyer remains un-tempted and human alive. 

Hope this helps. All the best.

24x7x365 April Fool of Indian Husbands & Courts.

I Always wanted to write this article from past 5 years but was missing this date of 1st April, due to some or the other work.

On 1st April one makes a prank on a victim, misleads him and later the victim discovers that he is been made a bakra. Husbands and the Indian Courts are the biggest Victims of Pranks year on year. Seven years ago, it was tough to prove the point that 498a is misused widely, as every time husbands were told that "it was an exceptional case of their suffering, otherwise in every other house the wife suffers". Now thanks to RTI, Supreme Courts’ intervention, Malimath committee report, media and NCRB data, the real picture is out.

498a with 406 is filed when wife is alive hence don’t mix it up with dowry death for arguing, as dowry death has a separate IPC. Now, in the court rooms, 498a has clocked only 2% conviction rate over the years, that means that 98% of the times the 498a was not qualified due to irrelevant evidences hence DV ACT was born. And well 80% of the times prima facie evidence were found as false and the inlaws were released immediately after arrests due to unqualifying and fraudulent charges. But with damage already done on the image of the god fearing husbands family. In other words they were already punked and magistrates  were fooled along with the husbands’ family with a presentation of false cases by the alimony brigade. The only way out from the non compoundable cases was to succumb to the alimony and settlement blackmail from the bride's camp.

It was always found out that the case was very weak and a byproduct of ego and misunderstanding of a stubborn bahu. More of an output out of an agenda to teach a lesson to the Indian husband. But the police as a protocol or due to pressure from TOP or lets face it - 99% of the times motivated by money, get a false case registered and produce the victims in the court. They call it a duty to report to the magistrate. This prank has its cascading effect. The bride with or without lawyer tells her false sob story to the police (1^st level fooling), police by close probing actually brainstorms a fiction to make a case and F.I.R (2^nd level fooling). This case now entitles the police to arrest the husbands family and produce them to the magistrate for bailing out. 

Govt Statistics show that out of every 100 cases, 98 cases suggest that they are motivated and intended for financial settlement and they meet that fate. This proves that false stats are actually believed to form  general opinions and new laws. These false cases further are used to harass more families with new laws. Fooling Galore continues 24x7x365....

However, after huge uproar of the victims, 498a came under a check recently and the suggestions were invited for improving it. But the fooling of the magistrate and judges continue by wives in different ways directly through courts without involving the police at 1^st level. The new fooling source is via false Domestic Violence Cases increasing day by day and Monthly ALIMONY to the able bodied wife on Husbands.

Yes its true, that to get a Grab of the husbands property or the so called matrimonial home, the DV cases are widely filed with lies and false evidences and Alimony... well we know the truth as wives have made the biggest fools of the courts by lying on oath that they are unemployed and depressed to work but when they are caught working, they lie by saying that they are simply engaged in training at a company or shop for refreshing with no income.

On the other hand, there are guys who have really lost their jobs due to stress of cases etc. but the fooled judges under sympathy make them pay through the nose and they are labeled as liars.  Judges shamelessly ask them to pay money (reverse dowry) and brides ask for exorbitant amounts for maintenance. Thus we witness Successful Fooling of court representatives and in turn fooling of the husband by the magistrate who may be a victim to the lies and so would be his judgment. All said and done, the biggest losers are the Indian Husbands 24x7x365.

The winner is the feminist metro bride, who still would cry of the bad situation of Indian women, and would justify that how by paying her 'alimony', the injustice on women in past since so many centuries would be undone. While there are brides too who suffer and they need protection on hand there are liars and fool makers in manifolds on the other hand.

The only way out is a neutral suo-motu misuse clause which will act as a deterrent in all cases, which is highly missing. Instead, constructive solutions should be enforced where estranged bride is reminded of her duties along with rights and if required she should be educated and made job ready so that her finances are secured and the fooling of judiciary 24x7x365 would stop, the exploitation of husband and national time and money would also stop.  This will also create a better individual feel good quotient.

But today, Indian Male the 82% percent tax payer is made to feel guilty for his existence as a male, and the false sobbing of the 'alimony brigade' on the other end continues with more false examples and stats of suffering. Thus making a fool of the family of Indian Husbands and the Indian Courts. Also fooled are public who only react to stats without questioning its authenticity till they become the target.

Have Full Proof and make system Fool Proof.


Jinesh Zaveri.