Make a wish through a False 498a and DV act
I was in college when for the very first time I came to know about an NGO called make a wish foundation who would fulfill the last wish of a Minor patient who is approaching an untimely death. Most of such wishes are to meet a celebrity or get a toy and spend a good time with them. Who would refuse such an opportunity as sympathy would never allow anyone to resist.
But a similar algorithm can be drawn as a parallel on the modus operandi to fulfill a demand which otherwise is an uphill task. But by executing this one can achieve a long awaited unfulfilled desire legally as well with sympathy and social pressure. I am talking about misuse of the Wife Centric Laws like 498a, 406, 315, 125 of Crpc and the Hiranyakashapu’s boon to Surpanakha that is DV Act. So now filing a false 498a and other sections to harass is like making a wish and judiciary and system will fulfill it.
The potential misusers are of two types one that are reported by executing the Make a Wish tool. It goes like this, wife wants a particular situation to happen like parents out of the house or a new flat etc she would express it to the Indian husband if he refutes or talks practical then she tries a legal formula to make a wish by writing her prayers to the police or Magistrate. She makes a wish to the husband by continuing the marriage by claiming that it is not a gudda guddi ka khel or she would simply want to quit but with parting gifts which are on her wish list and the catalyst would be a false 498a and its associated packages.
The other type is a very smooth operator. Who would claim to be a very good wife and could stump an individual as a caring wife because she will not file any cases of 498a et al. But would always threaten meticulously and get her wishes fulfilled without creating any statistics and only by selling fear through blackmailing.
Truly the Indian law judicial system is no less than a Make a Wish Foundation party that would fulfill the hidden wishes of the Indian wife openly in the name of cruelty, domestic violence, sympathy and a burden of duty by extracting and siphoning out the money from the male and his biological family members. But caution, as this prayer is allowed only to the Indian Daughters in Law, who can avail the benfits of legal pampering and extortion in the name of Women Empowerment in this so called male dominated society and biased Gender Discrimination. And make the most out of the dying marriage by creating nuisance for hubby and later selling peace to him.
posted by IndianHusbands | 5:09 PM
8 Comments:
Good one.
Sandeep ( President www.ghrs.in)
You are Brilliant . Keep it up
Hi Jinesh
'am posting a comment after a long time here
keep writing ...you have a flair for it
Males are the biggest victims of desire for sex ...including normal marital sex and / or sex before marriage .
To add to this Sohaib and a 1000s of others have added to the morass by paying huge ransoms to women who file false cases and harass them
More at http://bit.ly/cnt3td
nice Jinesh , i want to add some more word's .. in real our wife is judge.. and actual judge is servant of our wife. wife give the direction and judges run in that direction. wife ask money and judge follow the order to write the letter called judgement. in real legal matters even though judge is sitting in judge chair, But he had operated by Our Criminal wife.
Judges you are fool.. Your control is in hand of wifes. Fulfill our wife wish Which will declares you are servant of Indian IPC 498a Wife.. Entire Law maker are purchased by NCW... All baster Sitting in Loksa*** and Rajyasa*** had sold themselves to NCW , that is the main reason even after agreeing Gender biased LAw presence they need Four Year to Change it...
Unite All world Husband under one Roof and Kick out all Spineless Womenish Mens form All country politics...
Husband is punished for lifetime for the Crime Marriage.. even though Wife is Alive and eatting properly...
Husband=== HAS BAND== HASNA BAND
Good Article .. Keep it up !
As you truely said, the facility is available to only a few women who are capable of (mis)using law as a weapon against innocent families.
Such families eventhough they are apparently and evidently innocent are harassed and humiliated by the system which believes that the extortionist woman should be "paid off" to get rid of her. Even otherwise, she gets enough money in the form of maintenance through many different sections thereby making her whole effort of filing false cases completely worthwhile and productive.
Thanks Subu for writing. Keep visiting and participating.
Nanz, Sandeep thank you for your comments.
@misuseoflaw and Ganesh I am now addicted to read your comments.
Keep em coming. :)
Another classical example of the gross misuse of Dowry Act (498A) is the case of television celebrity, Suhaib Ilyasi. India's Most Wanted television host was in controversy after the dispute over his daughter Aaliya's custody rose soon after Ilyasi's wife Anju committed suicide on January 10, 2000 in Delhi. While his mother–in-law, Rukma Singh wanted custody of the child on the ground that she had the right under Muslim law, Ilyasi had taken the plea that his marriage with Anju was not solemnized as per the Muslim law but had been a civil affair. His sister-in-law Rashmi Singh came from Canada after six months of her sister's death and filed a complaint with the police against Ilyasi, alleging that he used to torture his wife Anju for dowry.
The case took bizarre turn when Anju's brother Prashant Singh and father Prof K P Singh took a diametrically opposite stand and described the allegations against Ilyasi as ``rubbish.'' Prashant told Express Newsline:`whatever my mother and sister Rashmi are stating against Suhaib Ilyasi is a lot of rubbish. There is no truth in their statement or in the charges filed by the police against Suhaib. If you are holding Suhaib responsible for Anju's suicide, then my mother and sister are also to blame, as they unduly interfered in their family matters.
K P Singh, a retired IIT professor, agreed with Prashant. “My wife and daughter are breaking up my family”. Both Anju's father and brother allege that Rukma and Rashmi have given statements against Suhaib as `they wanted custody of baby Aaliya. When Ilyasi delayed that, they put him in trouble.'
Anju's mother Rukma Singh had changed her earlier statement given in January, 2000, in which she had stated that she did not suspect any foul play by Suhaib Ilyasi. However when Ilyasi refused to give custody of his daughter, she change her statement and alleged dowry harassment against Ilyasi.
It has been alleged for long that Dowry Act (498a) in India is being consistently misused by clever women for extortion and blackmailing. The NCRB records suggest that during 2005-2006, 94% of the 498A, 304B cases filed by women or by her relatives were primarily to settle scores.
Section 498A in itself is, however, not meant to deal specifically with dowry -- it is commonly considered to be a 'dowry law' because domestic violence against a wife related to dowry demands is considered to be within the scope of 'cruelty' envisaged by the Section.
very good ... jitna bhi do inki bhk mit ti he nahi.. bechaarri aabla....indian naari
Post a Comment
<< Home