.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

IPC Section 498-A: Misuse

Dedicated to the Victimised Indian Families, Who are falsely threatened & Blackmailed by the Indian Daughters-In-Law & her family members, and those Victimised families who are already falsely charged under the Section 498A. Its all about False charges of Dowry Law, Domestic Violence, Alimony, Marriage and Divorce. NOTE: All articles are my personal copyright. They may be republished if the source is acknowledged and a link provided to this site. This is not an Anti-Women Blog. Read Disclaimer.

My Photo
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Women go to the police with a complaint (may be false), but the system provides to record that as a criminal complaint and that data adds in to the National Statistics of Crime Against Women. When male goes with a genuine complaint the police at max can record a Non Cognizable offence against the women. That will never reflect in the statistics. Then how will one guage crime against men? Every 100 Suicides in India have 63 Males and 37 Females. Every 100 male suicides have 45 married males, and every 100 women suicides have 25 married Women. Married women suicides have default arrests of the inlaws under presumed dowry death. Married men suicides entitle wife for a 50% share in property. What kind of equality is this? I thank you for visiting my blog, Please visit again. And I welcome you to participate on my Blog. [indianhusbands (at-the-rate) yahoo (dot) com]. Click here for Main Page

Sunday, January 29, 2006

Identity Crises of sLave indian family

What non-nuetral feminist brand as their problem, is actually a problem that Indian males encounter in the eyes of law. That is the problem of Identity crises. Ask those women who are the sisters of innocent brother who is behind bars. Ask those women who dreamt to have a 'daughter' in daughter-in-law but alas was treated as the misbranded mother in law by D-I-L. Ask those daughters who with the help of law, [that identifies women as only innocent and by default rules out any possibility of being guilty] had lied against their own blood (and later confessed).

In other words the Indian law in this case is quite generalizing. For a better explanation lets get Back to Basics, i.e my 1st article where I started from. I wrote about 4 cases where the law need not take care in First 2 cases, since they can take care of the situations themselves. Case 3 is recognized where the husband is like Rakshash and wife is like Sita. But the Identity crises starts with the case 4, as law refuses to identify this combination where the girl is like surpanakha and guy is like Ram. And treats the couple under the case 3 identification only. They infact need a Separate Identity in this 'Democratic and Republic Atmosphere'.

Now the Definitions: (as per the oxford)

Democracy: (noun), Government by all the people, direct or representative; form of society ignoring hereditary class distinctions and tolerating minority views.

Republic: (noun), A State in which supreme power is held by the people or its elected representatives or by elected or nominated president, not by monarch etc; (fig.)society with equality between members.

Americans choose one of these (republicans or democrats), every 4 years. Where as in India? Well… They claim they take best of both sides. But, since nothing is perfect, negatives also come attached along with this bhelpuri. In one such case the best goes to one gender and the loop holes come to the other.

Someone gets all the identity of being protected and other is on the end of making perpetual favors by some virtues called duties. I call this as over fencing.
Every time we talk about our innocence there are loads of people with statistics to support stating that there are so many dowry deaths etc etc etc. Hey wait!!! I did not tell them neither to give nor take dowry. Why should I bear the burden of those? Infact I belonged to the brigade of those who supported the ruthless law that punished the culprits. (with a little knowledge of its misuse) till it was about to be tried on me and my innocent parents. So I realized that we need a Separate Identity. According to me there should be nothing like majority or minority as guilty has to be punished with no strings attached and not victims at any level.

But for the sake of understanding let us analyze the case in the purview of definitions of Democracy and Republic:
A) Minority Report : Now, as per the statistics that femilitants give, for the moment let us accept their attested theory which states that "actual cases are in majority and there are rare cases of 498A misuse”, Then as per that statement the victims like us fall under minority and the definition states that Democracy is all about tolerating (accept) minority views too. Now I am sure you all will start supporting the idea of Republicans. But well in that case too nobody should be denied of justice.
B) Ignoring Hereditary views : On this point the daughters have rightly got their share in the parental property, now also let us discard the undue protection that Surpanakhas get under Hindu Marriage Act. In spite of them breaching most of or all the Seven Vows in most of the cases, which is ignored by law and no identity to innocent husbands seeking divorce is given.

As per the republic definition:
A) Society with equality in members:
I remember Rachna telling me in Europe where equality is in burden and responsibility sharing too. So both partners should earn. And alimony should not be a parasitic tool rather only in selected cases where the lady is acutally dependent and not capable of earning. Here nobody should be pseudo abla and everyone should be equal. And I support this vehemently. But in India the abla status given to even supanakhas give them the facility to suck the wealth of Ram and his family. Again failing to give a Separate Identity.

Identity crises in society too:
“Now, that is your side of the story.” I came across many people who told me this every time that I was been made to narrate my story to them.

Further the same statement “that is your side of the story” was heard with some social workers and counselors too. I wonder if the same statement would have been made to a girl who had gone to register a false complaint for the atrocities made by her In Laws.

I do not defy anyone labeling my narration as 'my side of the story', because as a representative of truth I do not fear litmus tests, but my question is why this is not asked when a girl goes to register a complaint or even during gossips where they are accompanied by the unlimited stocks of crocodile tears. They are taken on face value. The truth is the misuse of 498A is on rise. And the mis branding of ladkewalas is now a fashion statement, eclipsing the very fact of a requirement of Separate Identity.

This mis branding is very painful. Is it that females speak only truth? Is there any other statistic to support this???? Law made under this assumption has made a sLave of Indian families. Please Save Indian Families.
So, You don’t believe that women lie? Okay!!! To start with, ask my age, I will truly say that it is 30 years and 7 months or any other male in that case, but ask a women and there starts the first lie (you know what I mean). The rest follows…. :-D
For the Legally Challenged Gender,


Blogger Rebel said...

Excellent blog. I bet your blog has made these shameless spineless feminist speechless. I welcome tramps to leave a comment here because I would like to see what agrument they can make against this powerful blog. Come on women, show me what you've got. Maybe some feminist will comment because they don't have courage to read the whole blog and will write all crap.

Mon Jan 30, 09:05:00 AM GMT+5:30  
Blogger rachna said...

Great article! The Indian law system really needs to become more fair and stop being so biased! What is really needed is a heavy punishment for false complaints, as you have it in Europe in the form of heavy compensation payments to the victims and a mark in the judicial record, hence marked as a "criminal" which makes life a lot more difficult here.

Thu Feb 02, 01:18:00 PM GMT+5:30  
Anonymous srivastava said...

For me you look knowledge less...Infact not you, any other politician is as such...Do you think atleast sitting yourself for few minutes? thinking calmly.

DOWRY is centuries old tradition. Who you are you or anyone intrude in stopping that? are you insane? Dowry demand and torturing a person for dowry is something similar to politician doing for the country(bit lesser though)...So we can have SEc 420 as such...

Because of idiots ruling the country...situation is totally going out of control...Does this person know, percentage of male suicide statistics in India? Does this fellow know about Indian Men diabetes rate is largest in the world.? Does this fellow know, average Indian middle class men have to become hard labour in feeding his family(though women have become very fast and reading english novels while watching sun-tv at home)....who gave the right for Indian men to be bonded labor after marriage? Why Indian men are weaker than any other men of the world? why Indian women is leading in Miss universe/world competitions? Answer is simple..because of these kind of ppl. ruling India. Because, these ppl. make money easily and thinks every men is the same...

Dowry torture of a women is purely women "IGNORANCE". Remove ignorance and poverty from the country. If a women is hit, then only criminal law should apply, these mitigated politicians while sleeping, introduce stupid laws like 498a, which they term as mis-used. Infact, a school going child can define 498a as foolish law by definition itself. Where these creator of this law got the wider definition like "MENTAL CRUELITY". A non dowry related any family cases, marital problem, property etc., everything can be linked to mental cruelty and women are using this foolish law inside the families. Who help such innocent husbands...who calmly eat, worry, loose health in a decade and die by stroke or attack.


Tue Feb 07, 10:11:00 AM GMT+5:30  
Anonymous SIF Volunteer said...

Dear Srivastavaji,


Please join us in door to door awareness campaign. Contact our helplines.

We need your passion.

Tue Feb 07, 11:28:00 PM GMT+5:30  
Blogger Swarup said...

A lot of time I wonder , waht is the meaning of "Women" as per those sadist women of India who are responsible for such legal terrorism in India.
Human rights orginasations are jsut sleeping to earn the money by dishonest way and legal terrorists are moving freely in our society .. not that they even demanding President Award..

Wonder the meanning of "Women" had been Changed In India?

Mon Dec 04, 12:55:00 PM GMT+5:30  
Blogger Jinesh Zaveri said...

let me try swarup to answer your doubt.

Women for them Must be Who?Men?

and the identity crises starts. but the laws if women centric would have still spelled good news but they are all wife centric leading to punishment for all women members of husbands family too and that is appalling.

With DVBill added with no amendments in 498a, it is official that these laws are perpetually anti-men.

Mon Dec 04, 01:07:00 PM GMT+5:30  

Post a Comment

<< Home