.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

IPC Section 498-A: Misuse

Dedicated to the Victimised Indian Families, Who are falsely threatened & Blackmailed by the Indian Daughters-In-Law & her family members, and those Victimised families who are already falsely charged under the Section 498A. Its all about False charges of Dowry Law, Domestic Violence, Alimony, Marriage and Divorce. NOTE: All articles are my personal copyright. They may be republished if the source is acknowledged and a link provided to this site. This is not an Anti-Women Blog. Read Disclaimer.

My Photo
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Women go to the police with a complaint (may be false), but the system provides to record that as a criminal complaint and that data adds in to the National Statistics of Crime Against Women. When male goes with a genuine complaint the police at max can record a Non Cognizable offence against the women. That will never reflect in the statistics. Then how will one guage crime against men? Every 100 Suicides in India have 63 Males and 37 Females. Every 100 male suicides have 45 married males, and every 100 women suicides have 25 married Women. Married women suicides have default arrests of the inlaws under presumed dowry death. Married men suicides entitle wife for a 50% share in property. What kind of equality is this? I thank you for visiting my blog, Please visit again. And I welcome you to participate on my Blog. [indianhusbands (at-the-rate) yahoo (dot) com]. Click here for Main Page

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Choose 1: Better Jail for Hubbies or Funding a Terrorist?

Money is anyway going from our pockets, so let us Use it for Constructing a better and Separate Jail for Husbands rather than Funding a Financial Terrorist.
I would quote Sant Kabir on begging.....
“Mangan Maran Saman Hai,
Mat Koi Mange Bheekh,
Mangan Se Marna Bhala,
Yeh Satguru Ki Seekh”
Translation: "Begging is like perishing, none should go imploring, It is better to die than beg, this is pure Guru's teaching". This applies to both husband and wife and their sides (Dowry Species).
When the girl leaves the house just because she has an ego of earning on her own and being an able 21st century women, why is it that in the room of courts she changes her lingo to a lie of dependency. Just because she gets the facility of real monster alimony?

This article is written keeping in mind those couples capable of working, who have had a dowryless marriage and have been associated for a very short while and have got into endless loops of negotiations for alimony, where husbands have to shell money with no logic in binding.
Dada Bhagwan said in Gujarati: “Pota na Hak nu Khai te Manushya thai, Anhak nu khai tey janavar thai, hakknu bijane aapi de to devgati thai, ane annhakknu maari ne le toh narkgati ma jai.
Translation: (If you eat what belong to you then you get a life of a Human, If you eat from what is not yours then you become animal, if you donate what belongs to you then you get heaven, and if you snatch someone else’s rightful belonging then you get hell.)

Jainism also talks about good and ill effects of Supatradan and Kupatradan (donation to Deserving and underserving characters.)
The whole idea here is not to Lavish Care on an adult because it belong to a gender called female, it should be observed that she is able bodied and needs to be enabled with capabilities. To avoid the misuse of civil disobedience I would quote Gandhi “non cooperation of evil is equally important as is co-operation with evil”

During interviews on various national channels in india post the implementation of the Shameful DV Act, most women were happy to have a loosly drafted law that would terrorise the husbands. And they confessed that such a terror to the husband and his family is good rather than an equal law, thus justifying the misuse as their safety.

To such a harsh attitude, I would suggest the husbands to take a stand of disobedience to the ritual called alimony (SOWRY) and populate the jail. Well, it invokes a criminal procedure code amounting to Jail term to husband in case of contempt "But then its better to go to jail rather than funding a Terrorist who would settle scores with false cases in order to get their desired unjustified alimony". Lets become a majority in Jails and then have a separate cell for Husbands. If NCM is made we can allocate the funds for "special jail of husbands of educated wives" for violating the alimony law.

Let it start in the educated middle class sector where it is required, as Gandhi also committed this crime and made british to change their stand of pretending sleep.
Why be afraid of jails? The possible reasons are…
1. Badnaami (loss of reputation): Yaar Abhi kaunsi izzat bachchi hai. Aur itni badnaami ke baad paise kyu dene, time bhi to khoti hua. The damage to the image is already done and why pay a fine for our defamation and trauma? so jail is better option. We work hard and pay a share to govt and another to the legal trouble maker? No way.

2. Well the people around us would be criminals and terrorists in the lock up: Yaar shaadi se bada terror attack aur kaunsa ho sakta hai and terrorists ko jhelna shaadi ne sikha hi dia hai. (Some people do not fear terrorist, for they were married for some years in their life) All are as fearless as Major Unnikrishnan.
3. As explaied... Jail Bharo regularly: Never give them your obedience. Automatically the population of decent harassed victimized husbands would increase and this will create a special scope for a Jail or Cell exclusively for husbands.
--> These Professionals or Techie husbands in turn can serve the police by maintaining their websites, teach the lower cadre police with good speaking/ communication skills in English. Can help the police department in the IT Division on a great scale by automating their procedures. Do good backend jobs for the police under station arrests. And front end guys can attend phone calls and do coordination. For basically they are not criminals but are fighting the bugs in the system. And also empowering the system with their strengths.

Let us mean independence. Making her legally dependant and calling it independence, freedom and empowerment is a noteworthy contradiction. Lets Break that.

Let us allocate our funds for a special jail only for husbands rather than funding a Legal Terrorist. After contributing to 80% of the taxes, "Apni aazadi ko hum Hargiz Mita sakte Nahi, Sar Kata Sakte hai lekin Sar jhuka sakte nahi..."

The fight is not just with the otherhalf but with the system,

Jinesh Zaveri.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, January 03, 2009

Alimony Kills Her Real Potential

Indian Girls are born here but made elsewhere because in India it is believed legally that women are dependent and inferior. Thought they had voting rights right from the beginning as compared to the western world yet the capable lot is swayed by the thinking of being under privileged inspite of a lady ruling the country for 17 yrs (Indira Gandhi) and now as a president (Pratibha Patil).

The courts award alimony and encourage their belief of being handicapped. But the fact is that today they are ruling the work place and are better office makers too. If these women were pampered to believe that they are weak they would have never made it big and ya some of them could because they were abroad away from the Indian victim mindset. Infact in India most Parents encourage the girl child to be on self but the indian courts and some groups do not.

Right now randomly I can think of some names of dynamic Indian women …

1) Kalpana Chawla (Astronaut)
2) Suneeta Williams (Astronaut)
3) Kiran Bedi (Needs no Introduction)
4) Arundhati Roy (Novelist)
5) Chanda Kochar (ICICI Chief)
6) Renuka Ramanathan (ICICI Venture Chief)
7) Kalpana Morparia (J P Morgan; Chief - India Operations)
8) Kiran Mazumdar Shaw (C MD – Biocon)
9) Mira Nair (Director)
10) Shabana Azmi (Actress)
11) Indra Nooyi (CEO and Chairperson Pepsi)
12) Ekta Kapoor (Creative Head - Balaji Telefilms)

Then why can’t any other indian woman who is estranged from her husband and also is ambitious to make it big in life and profession do it? Why are such women awarded alimony before they could rise up? By giving this facility we are killing the real potential in that lady.

They too have the potential, this could be best explained by the below given content (This data is slightly old showing indra nooyi as CFO)

Indian Men V/s Indian Women
Shah Rukh Khan – Actor
Earning Rs.247 per minute

Brij Mohan Lall Munjal – Chairman
Earning Rs.255 per minute

Amitabh Bachchan – Actor
Earning Rs.361 per minute

Mukesh Ambani – Chairman
Earning Rs.413 per minute

Sachin Tendulkar – Cricketer
Earning Rs. 1,163 per minute
Indra Nooyi – CFO
Earning Rs. 2911 per minute
A lady earns higher than a man in India.
So, do not award Alimony (SOWRY) to the Indian women, award her a job that could unleash her potential. Do not kill the potential of an Indian women by rendering her Abla or Helpless and dependent or weak just because she believes so or it is legal. Abort the practice of life time alimony for the new generation divorced women. Gift her the real freedom from her husband. Let the husband sponsor her 1 time basic qualification needs or find her a job. Let her not beg as a legal right. Let us not Kill her Real Potential.

Best New Year Wishes,

Jinesh Zaveri.

Labels: , , , , , ,